{"id":7578,"date":"2025-01-28T10:11:41","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T10:11:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/?p=7578"},"modified":"2025-01-28T10:11:41","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T10:11:41","slug":"aydinda-koylulerin-cevre-zaferi-mahkeme-maden-sirketine-dur-dedi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/aydinda-koylulerin-cevre-zaferi-mahkeme-maden-sirketine-dur-dedi\/","title":{"rendered":"Ayd\u0131n\u2019da k\u00f6yl\u00fclerin \u00e7evre zaferi \u201cMahkeme maden \u015firketine dur\u201d dedi"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>Ayd\u0131n\u2019\u0131n Ko\u00e7arl\u0131 il\u00e7esine ba\u011fl\u0131 Ba\u011farc\u0131k K\u00f6y\u00fc \u00c7\u00f6rlen mevkiinde, Latmos (Be\u015fparmak) Da\u011flar\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n en bakir b\u00f6lgelerinden birinde yap\u0131lmak istenen madencilik faaliyetlerine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan dava k\u00f6yl\u00fclerin lehine sonu\u00e7land\u0131. \u00a0Ayd\u0131n 2. Y\u00f6netim Mahkemesi, Kanuna ve Anayasaya ters oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle maden faaliyetlerinin iptaline karar verdi.<\/div>\n<div>Egamin Madencilik taraf\u0131ndan b\u00f6lgedeki do\u011fal ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel alanlar\u0131 tahrip edecek formda planlanan madencilik faaliyetlerine kar\u015f\u0131, b\u00f6lgede ya\u015fayan k\u00f6yl\u00fclerden Dursun Sar\u0131 ve Latmos Platformu\u2019nun istekli hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 Av. Mehmet Cilsal ile Av. Y\u0131lmaz Kurt\u2019un deste\u011fiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. T.C. Ayd\u0131n 2. Y\u00f6netim Mahkemesi, \u00c7\u00f6rlen mevkiindeki maden faaliyetinin Kanuna ve Anayasaya ters oldu\u011funa h\u00fckmederek iptal karar\u0131 verdi.<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/aydinda-koylulerin-cevre-zaferi-mahkeme-maden-sirketine-dur-dedi-0-ZyyGvvpE.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><b>MAHKEMEYE GE\u00c7ERS\u0130Z EVRAK SUNDULAR<\/b><\/p>\n<div>Hukuk\u00e7u Mehmet \u00c7ilsal S\u00d6ZC\u00dc\u2019ye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada \u201cEgamin \u015eirketi&#8217;nin temsilcisi Enver Erdo\u011fan projenin yat\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na 5 y\u0131l i\u00e7inde ba\u015flamam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, yat\u0131r\u0131ma ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlayacak kantar ve sevk fi\u015fleri \u00fczere emniyetli evraklar sunulmamas\u0131, pasa d\u00f6k\u00fcm alanlar\u0131 ve maden i\u015fletme alan\u0131na dair saha teslim tespit tutanaklar\u0131 ile \u00fcretim bilgilerini de i\u00e7eren sat\u0131\u015f bilgi formlar\u0131n\u0131n Ba\u011farc\u0131k de\u011fil Milas Kayab\u00fck\u00fc\u2019ndeki maden oca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131, hasebiyle uydurma evrak sunularak \u201ckanuna kar\u015f\u0131 hile\u201d yoluna gidilmesi, t\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n y\u00f6netimin asla yapamayaca\u011f\u0131 cinsten s\u00fcre\u00e7ler olmas\u0131 nedeniyle dava konusu s\u00fcrecin yok karar\u0131nda say\u0131lmas\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftik\u201d s\u00f6zlerini kulland\u0131.<\/div>\n<div>\u00a0<\/div>\n<p><b>PROJEN\u0130N H\u0130\u00c7 B\u0130R KAMU FAYDASI TA\u015eIMADI\u011eI ORTAYA \u00c7IKTI<\/b><\/p>\n<div>\u00a0\u00c7ilsal kelamlar\u0131n\u0131 \u201cHukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7te davaya bakan mahkeme; bilirki\u015fi ke\u015fif ve incelemesi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f, ke\u015fif raporunun bilimsel tespit ve de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, \u00a0daval\u0131 y\u00f6netim ve daval\u0131 y\u00f6netim yan\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil rapora itiraz etmi\u015fse de itirazlar\u0131n eksper raporunu kusurland\u0131racak nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine uzman raporu karara temel al\u0131nabilecek nitelik ve yeterlilikte g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, projenin kamu faydas\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, b\u00f6ylelikle heyetin haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 raporu temel alarak dava konusu s\u00fcreci iptal etmi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ayd\u0131n\u2019\u0131n Ko\u00e7arl\u0131 il\u00e7esinde Latmos Da\u011flar\u0131\u2019nda yap\u0131lmak istenen madencilik faaliyetleri, a\u00e7\u0131lan davayla durduruldu. Mahkeme, Kanuna ve Anayasaya ters oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle faaliyetlerin iptaline karar verdi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7579,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[148,1881,1129],"class_list":["post-7578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-dava","tag-idare","tag-maden"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7578"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7581,"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7578\/revisions\/7581"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikimisli.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}